Close CloseAsk Question Ask QuestionView  Q & A View Q & APrint Print

PROJECT ADMINISTRATION INSTRUCTIONS
PAI No. 5.01
Issued on December 2018
Revised on December 2023


EXECUTING AGENCY’S PROGRESS REPORT 1

1. The Asian Development Bank’s (ADB’s) loan regulations and agreements require the borrower2 to provide reports and information that ADB reasonably requests. This Project Administration Instruction (PAI) describes the content and requirements for the executing agency’s (EA)3 periodic progress reports that enable the borrower and ADB to monitor project progress, become aware of issues during implementation, and assess whether the project outputs and outcome will be achieved.4

2. During loan processing, the EA and ADB will agree on the format, content, and timing for the submission of progress reports, taking account of the nature of the project and the information and reporting systems for such project. The agreed format should be appended to the fact-finding mission’s memorandum of understanding/aide-mémoire.

3. The progress report should include sufficient information on detailed reports prepared by consultants or contractors under the EA’s management. These reports should be made available for ADB review, midterm review, and project completion review missions.

4. The progress report should capture key information as suggested in Appendix 1. Such information will be used to update the project record in eOperations, including performance rating indicators. Detailed information such as background to a particular problem should be included as an annex to the report. Simple charts such as bar or milestone charts to illustrate implementation progress, actual versus planned expenditures, and the relationship between physical and financial performance should be included. The guidelines for calculating project progress and a sample implementation schedule are shown in Appendix 2.

5. The project team provides the EA with the latest report format after the loan approval and before the project inception mission to remind them of ADB‘s progress reporting requirements. The report format should be discussed and finalized during the project inception mission and incorporated in the project administration manual (PAM), if applicable. Generally, the EA submits the progress reports quarterly,5 regardless of progress achieved during the period.

6. The project team will review the progress report once received. If a progress report is not received within 2 weeks of the scheduled date of receipt, the project team sends a reminder immediately to the EA. Repeated delays in sending progress reports should be discussed with the EA promptly and during project administration missions.

    1 In this PAI, the term “loan(s)” includes grant(s), and the term “project(s)” excludes program(s) and results-based loans, unless the context requires otherwise. This PAI also applies to loans from external sources that are administered by ADB, unless agreed otherwise between ADB and cofinancier(s).
    2 In this PAI, the term “borrower” also refers to recipients of grants, executing agencies, and/or implementing agencies, unless the context requires otherwise
    3 The term “executing agency (EA)” also refers to implementing agency, unless the context requires otherwise.
    4 Refer to Operations Manual Section D4: Policy-based Lending and relevant staff instruction for progress report requirements of policy-based loans.
    5 The progress report is normally required to be submitted within 6 weeks after the end of each quarter.



PAI 5.01
Appendix 1
EXECUTING AGENCY’S PROGRESS REPORT CONTENTS


A. Introduction and Basic Data

B. Utilization of Funds

C. Project Purpose and Implementation Progress

D. Compliance with Covenants

6 Sections VII. Safeguards and VIII. Gender Equality and Social Dimensions of the PAM.

E. Major Project Issues and Problems

Summarize the major problems and issues affecting or likely to affect implementation progress, compliance with covenants, and achievement of project outputs and outcome, including the findings of any project procurement-related review that may have been undertaken. Recommend actions to overcome these problems and issues (e.g., changes in scope, changes in implementation arrangements, and reallocation of loan proceeds). If any substantial cost savings are anticipated, a proposal for partial cancellation of the surplus loan proceeds, or their utilization through a change of scope, should be discussed. If any substantial cost overruns are anticipated that exceed the available resources from all sources of financing, a proposal for additional financing (or adjustment of project scope to stay within the available funding sources) should be discussed. Incorporate the audit qualifications and internal control recommendations (from the internal audit report, external audit report and management letter) and the timebound action plan to address them.


PAI 5.01
Appendix 2

GUIDELINES IN CALCULATING PROJECT PROGRESS

A. Introduction

1. Physical and pre-commencement activities are considered in calculating project implementation progress. These activities, which may include recruitment of consultants, capacity building, detailed design, preparation of bid and prequalification documents, etc., could constitute a significant proportion of overall implementation and should be counted.

2. Each activity in the implementation schedule will be weighed according to its overall contribution (using time as a reference) to project implementation. These weights will then be used to calculate the percentage of project progress along the entire implementation period of the project. This is to provide a holistic view of the pace of implementation.

B. Compiling Activity List and Assigning Weights

3. The project team should identify major implementation activities and include them in the implementation schedule, which is included in the PAM. The implementation schedule should be consistent with the outputs in the design and monitoring framework.

4. Corresponding weights for each activity should be assigned to ensure that project progress measures the percentage of achievement for all events during the entire duration of the implementation schedule. To avoid disproportionate assignment of weights, to the extent possible, these should be evenly distributed along the implementation schedule. When activities are concurrent, avoid “double counting.” The total weight for all activities should be equal to 100.

5. Once all activities are identified and corresponding weights assigned, project progress should be calculated using the following steps:

(i) Determine the actual percentage progress (nonfinancial) of each activity;
(ii) Multiply these percentages by the assigned weight of each activity to arrive at the weighted progress; and
(iii) Add up the resulting weighted progress of all activities to determine the project progress.

6. Figure A2.1 provides an illustration of the calculation using a generic sample implementation schedule and Figure A2.2 is a specific example.


Figure A2.1: Implementation Schedule with Activities and Weights



Figure A2.2: Sample Implementation Schedule Progress at Q4 Year 1